If you want something done right, you have to do it yourself.
For people who can focus on a single rogue Frosted Flake across the room, that’s the logic behind assigning themselves the job of vacuuming rather than letting a robot vacuum do it. Then again, vacuuming isn’t a chore when your sidekick is a whipping delight. Just ask anyone who’s seen a Dyson in someone’s home and been overwhelmed with the urge to ask if they can try it.
Cordless vacuums vs robot vacuums
The convenience of not having to lift a finger isn’t always worth the grimace that comes with watching a robovac ignore crumbs under the cabinet lip or eat a laptop charger. 3D obstacle sensors and LiDAR mapping are better than guessing, even the best robot vacuums can’t match the precision of an actual human with a brain operating a vacuum manually.
In terms of power, upright vacuums are much less likely to need a second or third pass to catch everything in their path. A robot vacuum’s motor can’t exceed the three or four inch clearance the vacuum needs to get its entire body under furniture. The motor of an upright vacuum cleaner generally lives completely separate from the opening and the rotating brush and is subjected to less stress. More space means a bigger, better motor that creates bigger, better suction.
It also means a larger dust bin and less frequent emptying.
Cordless vs. Corded Vacuums
While corded vacuums obviously make battery life a non-issue, having to charge is absolutely worth not being tethered to the wall, struggling with knots, and dropping multiple F-bombs as the cord twists. inevitably gets stuck on a chair leg. (The best cordless vacuums should have enough juice to last an entire cleaning session anyway.)
Cutting the cord is especially crucial for cleaning tricky places that aren’t even on a robot vacuum’s radar, like stairs or cars.
And these aren’t the retro bricks your grandma dragged around the house on wheels. Ignoring the cordless factor for a second, stick vacuums are the moment because of their accessible design. It’s aesthetically pleasing, easy to store, and a hell of a pleasure to whip up. Most follow the same setup: a cleaner head and a motor/bagless dustbin with a trigger for your finger, connected by a long neck (the “stick”) with a circumference not much thicker than a water bottle. . Minimal parts keep these vacuums between five and nine pounds, making them easy to use with one hand or lift to skim the ceiling.
The internals are really what fills the pros and cons lists. Suction power and battery life are obvious criteria, along with modern upgrades such as floor-type sensing technology.
Dyson versus others
Dyson is therefore close to being the Kleenex or band-aid of the vacuum cleaner world – the name everyone calls any old stick vacuum like it’s just the umbrella term. Are the Dysons really worth the hype, though?
SEE ALSO: The best Dyson vacuums: a guide to the latest versions of stick, ball and handheld cleaners
Yes, they are. Whether or not Dyson officially designed the first-ever cordless stick vacuum, the it girl brand at least popularized the slim, zipped design. They take two main aspects from older corded Dysons: the Radial Root Cyclone technology (a strong centrifugal force created by cyclonic separators that minimize the amount of particles in the air, sending dirt and dust straight into a cartridge) and the design iconic ball for agility to maneuver under furniture and around corners.
The performance of a Dyson is easy to see IRL but harder to compare on paper. The brand measures suction in Air Watts (AW) while most competitors measure suction power in Pascals (Pa). Some manufacturers do not quote the suction power at all. Direct conversions are tricky because the measurements themselves, which both refer to pressure, are not directly comparable. Luckily, there’s no need to get into the weeds when the evidence is in the clear dust pan.
Here are our top picks for the best cordless vacuum cleaners in 2022: