Home Outlet store Credit Suisse has allowed morally bankrupt people to steal from the poor for too long | Switzerland

Credit Suisse has allowed morally bankrupt people to steal from the poor for too long | Switzerland

0

Jhe explosive revelations about Swiss secrets, reported by the Guardian and a number of international media, are a continuation of the groundbreaking work of the Panama Papers and the Paradise Papers. In a way, it’s the same old story over and over again. Every time journalists lift the curtain of financial sector secrecy, a web of corruption and nefarious activity is exposed, disproportionately by shady clients and families of dictators, with a handful of seemingly respectable politicians in democracies caught. in the net.

But this time there is something different. This time it’s not a small, obscure offshore island or a struggling developing country trying to find an alternative business model to drugs. It is a large bank in the center of Europe, in one of the most prosperous countries in the world; a country where the “rule of law” is Assumed reign supreme. All the more disappointing as the country and the bank involved have made promises of transparency and to do better. And that’s the point: without more transparency, there can be no accountability.

In fact, Switzerland’s position appears increasingly two-sided, with a legal framework that penalizes those who try to discover its secret. Countries around the world have passed whistleblower laws, recognizing how difficult it is to uncover unwanted behavior. Frances Haugen’s exposure of Facebook’s wrongdoings probably wouldn’t have been possible without tough US whistleblower laws. But Switzerland, one of the oldest democracies in the world, appears to have doubled down on its commitment to secrecy, regardless of the incentives it offers for bad behavior, by threatening journalists and others who try to access data. showing what is happening in the darkness of its financial system.

Quick Guide

swiss secrets

To show

What is the leak of Swiss secrets?

Suisse secrets is a worldwide journalistic investigation into a data leak from the Swiss bank Credit Suisse. It includes more than 18,000 bank accounts that were leaked to Süddeutsche Zeitung by a whistleblower who said Swiss bank secrecy laws were “immoral”. The data, which is only a partial capture of the bank’s 1.5 million private banking clients, is linked to more than 30,000 Credit Suisse clients. The leak includes personal, shared and corporate bank accounts – holding an average of 7.5 million Swiss francs (CHF). Nearly 200 accounts in the data are worth more than CHF 100 million, and more than a dozen are valued in the billions. While some accounts in the data were open as early as the 1940s, more than two-thirds have been opened since 2000. Many of them were still open in the past decade, and some remain open today.

The Guardian was among more than 48 media partners around the world, including journalists from Le Monde, NDR, the Miami Herald and the New York Times. They spent months using the data to investigate the bank, in a project coordinated by Süddeutsche Zeitung and the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP). They uncovered evidence that Credit Suisse accounts had been used by clients involved in torture, drug trafficking, money laundering, bribery and other serious crimes, suggesting widespread breaches of due diligence form the bank. It is not illegal to have a Swiss account and the leak also contained data from legitimate customers who had done nothing wrong. In its response, Credit Suisse said it “strongly rejects the allegations and inferences regarding the bank’s alleged business practices.”

Thank you for your opinion.

Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, no Swiss media were able to join the global journalism collaboration due to the danger of serious legal consequences under the country’s bank secrecy laws. But journalists from other countries should also be commended for risking the possibility of prosecution by Swiss authorities. Certainly, Switzerland must be aware of the chilling effect of its legislation: perhaps its very intention was to preserve its business models for as long as possible, to take a small share of the ill-gotten gains of others, in exchange for providing a safe and secret place to hoard and store the geld.

Switzerland’s secrets have two particularly alarming aspects. The international journalistic collaboration has seen only a small part of the bank’s customer data, but if in this tiny part are already so many problematic customers, including dictators and their families, suspected war criminals, intelligence officials and chiefs, a human trafficker, sanctioned businessmen and human rights violators – a veritable gallery of thugs – what would we see if the bank window were bigger ?

Second, it seems that the countries that suffer the most from the bank’s aid to bad actors are developing countries and emerging markets. The revelation confirms what experts have long warned: Switzerland has agreed to an automatic exchange of information primarily with other advanced countries, but not with poor countries, and especially those that may harbor these illicit activities. As a result, kleptocracy and corruption can still thrive.

It’s good to see that journalists believe in their duty to report, and that they fight for the “right to know” of citizens of countries like Switzerland, who cannot control what their politicians hide. Politicians from advanced countries like to make speeches condemning corruption elsewhere. But it is countries like Switzerland that are the main catalysts: that provide the safe haven, guaranteeing long-term returns.

Let’s be clear: Switzerland is not alone. He rightly complains that closing the door there will only shift business to real estate and finance in Miami, London or other money laundering hubs. Yet there is something morally repugnant about those in the US, UK or Switzerland who live off the loot stolen from those who are so much poorer. And countries like Switzerland that have devised a legal code that makes this system thrive should be particularly embarrassed.

How many stories, how many revelations, how many exposures will it take for Switzerland, the United States, the United Kingdom and other countries to change their banking and real estate secrecy laws, and all other activities that facilitate money laundering and promote crime and corruption? While this hoard showed that Switzerland benefited from a flow of money from poor countries, the system itself is corrupt: the rotting of tainted money spoils everything it comes in contact with.

Hopefully the secrets of Switzerland, this enormous achievement of honest and honorable journalism, will put those who resisted the creation of a more transparent financial and economic system to shame.